Which of the following is NOT a potential outcome of improper munitions disposal?

The option indicating watershed protection is correct when stating it is NOT a potential outcome of improper munitions disposal. Improper disposal of munitions can lead to a variety of harmful consequences, including soil contamination, which occurs when hazardous materials seep into the ground and alter its quality. There can also be significant threats to human health through exposure to toxic substances that may be present in munitions, leading to health risks for nearby populations. Additionally, ecosystems can be severely impacted, as chemicals from improperly disposed munitions can disrupt local flora and fauna, leading to biodiversity loss and habitat degradation.

In contrast, watershed protection implies the safeguarding of water quality and natural ecosystems that could potentially be harmed by improper munitions disposal. Therefore, watershed protection is not a potential outcome of such actions, highlighting its distinction from the other harmful effects associated with mishandling military munitions.